Chenango residents speak out at DEC gas hearing

CHENANGO BRIDGE – A Smithville Center woman wore a toxic waste drum and handed out fake one thousand dollar bills. A woman from Marathon helped hold up a sign accusing New York state regulators of being the puppets of big industry.

And the words “the poor farmers need the money” could be heard often upon entering Chenango Valley High School Thursday night for the second in a series of public hearings on proposed environmental regulations for permitting natural gas drilling into the nation’s largest gas reserve, the Marcellus Shale.

The first, held in New York City earlier this week, attracted similar protests, with one individual storming the stage yelling and, afterward, being escorted out.

But the more than 1,000-member audience that packed the school’s auditorium to the brim were predominantly pro-drilling and asked the Department of Environmental Conservation to lift the ban so natural gas companies could begin their work immediately. More public officials and leaders of land coalitions (who were often one and the same) than environmental activists took the microphone during an orderly, controlled comment period.



“I’m surprised,” said Chenango County Farm Bureau President Bradd Vickers observing the crowd. “I thought there would be more protest.”

About 15 government officials representing Broome County, from the City of Binghamton to the towns of Conklin, Barker, Sanford and others, were joined by state Assemblymen Clifford Crouch, R-Guilford, Gary Finch, R-C, Springport, and Assemblywoman Donna Lupardo, D-Endwell, to present their comments first. And most of the elected representatives stayed to hear the public do the same.

“The vast majority of the people I talk to are pro-drilling, but are concerned that it be done right. ... I tend to think we can move forward with due diligence,” said Crouch.

The other Assembly representatives present echoed Crouch’s vow to “do everything in my power” to find the funding that will staff the DEC with enough boots on the ground to control the wastewater from drilling.

“It’s vitally important that we get it right,” said Lupardo. “There’s a lot of pressure to move forward and a lot of pressure to step back and get it right. Take this time on the front end to get this correct.”

Lupardo also called for adequate infrastructure at the state’s Public Service Commission, something Vickers and the Farm Bureau has called for repeatedly. The PSC only monitors pipelines that are a certain pressure despite there size, and has no controls over where they are.

Discuss this story with other members on the Forum


There's more to this story! You're only seeing 41% of the story. Subscribe now to get immediate access to the rest of the story as well as our whole online offering.

Today's Other Stories



Reader Response

4 comments on this story

ShaleNo
November 14th, 2009 at 11:23 am
@boomer: You say that the DEC is bound by law to allow the drilling. That's just not true. You're correct that developing the state's resources is a part of the agency's mandate, but that duty must be balanced against the "Environmental Conservation" that gives the agency its name. As a matter of law, DEC is not obligated to approve any particular method of drilling just because it fosters gas production; it must also ensure that the environment will be protected.

Unfortunately, you may be right about what DEC will do, but that's another matter; the point is, your legal analysis is mistaken.
boomer
November 14th, 2009 at 1:41 am
loriebennett. Wah, wah, it wasn't fair! Grow up. Everyone is entitled to have their comment heard. You can send yours in by e-mail or snail mail. The DEC has to record them all. Or were you just looking for media coverage? Oh, by the way, the DEC is bound by state law to allow the use and development of the state's natural resources. They can regulate, but they cannot, and will not stop the drilling. Get over it.
loriebennett
November 13th, 2009 at 5:03 pm
The reason more pro-drilling people had the microphone than anti-drilling people was because the landowners all came at 3:30PM and got in line first. The published time to arrive was 6:00PM, but if you followed that instruction, you had no chance to speak. The pro-drillers were not there to comment on the dSGEIS, which few of them did, but, to keep their opponants from doing so. There were over 170 people signed up to speak, and only 60 got to do so. There were many more against the drilling than your article portrays.
boomer
November 13th, 2009 at 11:52 am
The people trying to ban drilling have already lost. The DEC is determined to go foward with it. The only thing to do now is see that proper precations are taken.
Please log in to leave a comment.
© 2010 Snyder Communications/The Evening Sun
29 Lackawanna Avenue, Norwich, NY 13815 - (607) 334-3276
We're on Facebook