City receives $300,000 to restore Norwich properties

NORWICH – Three properties in the City of Norwich that have been eyesores for many years will soon be removed from the landscape. On Tuesday, the city received notification from Assemblyman Clifford Crouch (R-Guilford) that they would receive $300,000 as part of the Restore New York Grant.

The Restore New York Grant would allow the city to acquire problem properties in the city that could not be repaired. The grant provides funding for the demolition of the homes and for building new homes in their place. The city applied for the grant last year, but was not selected.



“This particular program allows the city to improve its downtown area,” Crouch said, “by upgrading older buildings, or in this case demolishing buildings that no longer serve a purpose. At the same time, building housing for residential use will create an influx of people to downtown areas, ensuring continued vitality in the business district.”

The grant application included plans for three city-owned properties. A property located at 23 Grove Ave., which Mayor Joseph Maiurano said has been boarded up for nearly 30 years, and a trailer located at 7 Waite St. will be demolished as part of the program. Stick-built or modular homes, keeping with the architecture of the area, will replace the structures. In addition, a burned-out property located at 52 Fair St. will also be demolished. Instead of building a new residence on that site, the city has entered into negotiations with the Chenango Valley Home and Apartments to move a house there that’s currently located on Canasawacta Street.

Discuss this story with other members on the Forum


There's more to this story! You're only seeing 45% of the story. Subscribe now to get immediate access to the rest of the story as well as our whole online offering.

Today's Other Stories



Reader Response

1 comments on this story

norwichreader
January 16th, 2008 at 3:59 pm
Can the buildings be condemned and be the responsibility of the property owner to remove the building or improve it? I hope the property is calculated on the cost of the land minus the cost to demolish the building. It does seem as though up keep or demolition of a building should be the current property owner's responsibility, and not that of the city. In no case should the property owner benefit from causing such an eyesore.
Please log in to leave a comment.
© 2009 Snyder Communications/The Evening Sun
29 Lackawanna Avenue, Norwich, NY 13815 - (607) 334-3276