Lawsuit against anti-NYRI law thrown out

ALBANY – A federal judge ruled Friday that New York Regional Interconnect Inc. has no case against the legislators who changed a state law last year to prohibit the power line company from legally taking private property needed for its $1.6 billion project.

NYRI filed a lawsuit last February in U.S. District Court in Albany against a dozen current and former lawmakers who crafted a revision to state utility law that blocks the company’s right to use eminent domain, saying the amendment – signed into law by former Governor George Pataki in October 2006 – violates the constitution and its right to equal protection under the law.

“It’s unconstitutional for the legislature to pass a law that targets one person or company or singles them out for different treatment,” said NYRI attorney Leonard Singer back in February.



Over 19 months after announcing the project, Albany-based NYRI has yet to undergo a state review or provide a complete power line permit application.

Attorney General Andrew Cuomo sees U.S. District Judge Thomas McAvoy’s decision to throw out the case Friday as “a win” for homeowners across New York.

“The judge’s decision is a win for home owners in Central New York and across the state,” said Cuomo in a prepared statement Friday. “As Attorney General, I will continue to fight for New York’s right to make decisions on projects like NYRI based on our state’s environmental and energy needs, not on the desires of private companies or the federal government.”

Recent reports from state and national electricity grid operators state that New York’s increasing energy demands can be met without NYRI’s proposal, which would deliver upstate electricity through a 190-mile-long transmission line to power-starved areas in and around New York City.

The line would cut through eight counties, including six townships and 44 miles in Chenango.

The grid reports have re-affirmed NYRI’s opponent’s claims that the company is not seeking to improve the state’s energy infrastructure, but rather – fueled by overblown policies coming out of Washington – is looking to make a big profit at the expense of upstate communities.

Discuss this story with other members on the Forum


There's more to this story! You're only seeing 44% of the story. Subscribe now to get immediate access to the rest of the story as well as our whole online offering.

Today's Other Stories



Reader Response

2 comments on this story

pubbuster
October 29th, 2007 at 2:13 pm
This eminent domain law will not stop the federal government. The DOE can still approve the line and the taking of land through eminent domain.

A good example this past summer was the land taken for expanding carrolsal mall and the water front in Syracuse which was taken by emunent domain and held up by the courts.
Norwichite82
October 29th, 2007 at 11:41 am
Chalk up a win for the little guy. Hold on tight to your victory. Let NYC buy flashlights and learn to ride bicycles.
Please log in to leave a comment.
© 2008 Snyder Communications/The Evening Sun
29 Lackawanna Avenue, Norwich, NY 13815 - (607) 334-3276