Fire, ambulance rates still an issue for Norwich Common Council

NORWICH – Town ambulance and fire contract rates were the biggest issue on the agenda at Tuesday night’s meeting of the Norwich Common Council.

The issue, which was discussed at the January Finance and Personnel Committee meeting, is that a five-year contract between the city and surrounding towns for ambulance and fire service expired in December. Committee members had expressed concern with the fee structure charged to the towns for the services.

“We wanted to confirm the dollar amount, going forward over the next five years, would be adequate,” said City Finance Director Bill Roberts. In addition to the fixed costs associated with the services, the city also has to take the rising costs of labor, benefits, energy and fuel into consideration. Roberts said that after some preliminary calculations, put together by Mayor Joseph Maiurano and Council President Terry Bresina, the city seems to be breaking even.



In addition, Roberts pointed out that because the initial contracts had already been received by the towns, public meetings had already been held and tax rates for those fire districts had already been implemented. “It would make it complex to change things now,” Roberts said.

Ward 4 Alderman Walter Schermerhorn said he would like to see the numbers before any decision was reached.

Discuss this story with other members on the Forum


There's more to this story! You're only seeing 43% of the story. Subscribe now to get immediate access to the rest of the story as well as our whole online offering.

Today's Other Stories



Reader Response

1 comments on this story

jmichael
January 24th, 2007 at 11:25 am
I said it before and I will say it again. I still think the need for a paid fire house is uncalled for in such a small community. Everything surrounding the City of Norwich is volunteer. Why not this one? With all surround communities doing it on a volunteer basis, why do we have to pay extra for these services? Just like the old saying goes; Why buy the milk, when you could milk the cow for free? But the reality is, the majority of firefighters are not paid to perform these same tasks, so why do you think we should have to pay for this one? I could see if every paid firefighter was trained more then the volunteer fire fighter, or even if you did something other volunteers do not do. You are doing the same thing as the volunteer with the exception of getting paid for it. Why?

Now for the disclaimer: This is in no way to say that the firefighters should not be paid for what they do. In fact, I personally think ALL firefighters SHOULD be paid for what they do. I have much respect and offer many thanks to fire fighters for what they do and how they have helped me in the past. So before you get angry and start sending me anonymous hate mail, please take into consideration that you are being paid to perform the same responsibilities as someone else who is not being paid for it. Would you want to pay for a pizza, when you could go right down the road and it for free? Of course not, and neither would anyone else. So right now it seems there are 2 options either pay every firefighter, or turn this one to a volunteer station. But just so it does not seem unreasonable. We should offer ALL firefighters some kind of incentives, for the willingness to endanger their lives, just to save someone else. How about free family health care, college assistance for their children, life insurance, Tax breaks, etc.
These are just my opinions what are your thoughts on this?
Please log in to leave a comment.
© 2008 Snyder Communications/The Evening Sun
29 Lackawanna Avenue, Norwich, NY 13815 - (607) 334-3276