Seventy-six dogs seized in Oxford

OXFORD – Seventy-six Pomeranians were rescued from a property in Oxford on Sunday in a coordinated effort by the Chenango County Sheriff’s Department and the Chenango County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA). Their owner was taken into custody the following day.

At the behest of deputies, SPCA Executive Director Carol Hedlund led a team of SPCA board members and staff into the house at 145 Williams Road in Oxford to retrieve the animals. She described the conditions they found as “horrific.”

Hedlund, who has been involved with a dozen similar seizures including a puppy mill bust in Chenango County earlier this year, ranked it as one of the worst she has seen.

“Everything in the house was covered in feces. We had to wear respirator masks to go get the dogs,” said Hedlund. Those who entered the house also used mentholated rub under their noses to mask the strong odor of fecal matter and urine. Duct tape secured pant legs and boots.



The double-wide trailer was unoccupied with the exception of the dogs. Hedlund reported that bags of food had been torn open and left for the animals. The contents, which were still being consumed by the dogs, had been defecated and urinated upon.

The dogs, which are considered evidence in the case against their owner, were taken to the SPCA where they will remain for the time being.

In addition to the 76 dogs recovered from the house, the remains of more than a dozen more were discovered in a wooded area adjacent to the structure.

“We took out 13 bags with at least one dog in each,” said Hedlund. A more accurate count was difficult because of the decomposition of the remains.

Hedlund stated that she believed the remains had been recently removed from the house, explaining that a cardboard box that held some of the bags did not appear to have been weathered.

The owner of the property, Steven W. Fong, 56, of 405 Clinton Avenue in Brooklyn, was arrested on Monday. He was charged with 76 counts of failure to provide for an impounded animal.

Discuss this story with other members on the Forum


There's more to this story! You're only seeing 42% of the story. Subscribe now to get immediate access to the rest of the story as well as our whole online offering.

Today's Other Stories



Reader Response

9 comments on this story

Sue3608
October 18th, 2008 at 11:47 am
I knew someone with the same disorder but cats. She took in every stray and thought she was doing a good thing but her house stunk to high heaven and she was always covered in cat hair. She started doing it after her husband died and she was really attached to them. It was pretty obvious that she was losing it.
Nina
October 17th, 2008 at 2:15 am
Thank you for your kind response AROD3KS, Circe, I can understand your opinions about putting up chickenwire not being hard to do, and all the other sensible solutions you suggested, but you're looking at the situation rationally when this isn't a rational situation, it's a mental and emotional problem and dog hoarders are often reclusive and agoraphobic. They live in fear of their neighbors seeing or hearing their dogs and being disturbed and complaining, so they avoid them. I don't know where you got the idea that he didn't live there, he did, and he did live with his dogs under the same conditions. He definitely didn't abandon the dogs except to go get his house ready for sale for a day or two at a time. As for the neighbors helping him, that's what you or I might do and it makes perfect sense under normal conditions, but let's face it these aren't normal conditions. From the interview I saw with his neighbors in the papers, they repeatedly said they wanted him to leave, they didn't want him living there, it's not like they were bringing over a homemade pie. He was new in the area and I'm sure they weren't thrilled. I don't know how you know about the offers he had on his house, but it's true, however it's not the whole story. He had a neighbor who wanted to buy his house so she could expand her own property and she offered him MUCH less than the house was worth, probably only half, and was very angry that he didn't sell it to her. I think she may have known he was very vulnerable and wanted to take advantage of the situation. As far as getting help, your right, there should be help for people who have this problem but it's very misunderstood. I saw the pictures of the dogs on TV, they didn't look malnourished or lethargic or ill, they're very sweet, cute, friendly and alert, they were all wagging their tails and looked pretty healthy from what I could see in the film. Try to understand Circe, you're probably a very well adjusted, successful person in your life with lots of friends and hopefully a loving family, so I know it's hard for you to grasp how a situation like this can get so out of control. We can only thank God we haven't had to experience the suffering and loneliness that this person has gone through and try to be charitable and understanding.
circe
October 15th, 2008 at 12:08 am
This man obviously has issues, but that's still no excuse for the conditions to be so extreme. I think this was neglect and unexcusable. He didn't live in those conditions, he didn't live in that house only the dogs did.

He wasn't seen at the trailer for long periods of time. If he was here on a regular basis he could have cleaned up after the dogs a little at a time. The feces in the trailer took a long time to build up like that.
He could have built a pen outside for them to get fresh air, wire fencing is inexpensive and easy to put up. He could have opened the windows to let some air inside instead of covering them with newspapers.

He could have had someone watch the dogs while he was gone. A friend or neighbor could have given his dogs clean food and water every day.

When was the last time the dogs saw a vet? Rabies shots are offered free several times a year, did the dogs have shots? Were they spayed or neutered? What happened with the puppies? Did he separate the pregnant females? I doubt it. Those are simple things anyone could have done.

If he had a mental illness he could have gotten low cost or free help from the mental health clinic.

The home in Brooklyn was worth a lot of money and he had several offers for over a million dollars which he turned down in the past! If he needed money he could have easily obtained it by selling the house years ago but he turned down the offers.

Sure, his life wasn't that great, but he could have had help all along. Maybe now he can get the help he needs and the dogs can find good homes.
AROD3KS
October 14th, 2008 at 10:54 pm
its nice to know the whole story. thanks for sharing
October 14th, 2008 at 9:39 pm
This is such a sad situation, it's not what it seems. Hoarding of animals is a mental illness usually brought on by terrible childhood trauma or abuse, which I happen to know is the case in this situation. This is a very gentle, loving soul who wouldn't hurt a fly and loves his dogs with all his heart and couldn't bear to part with any of them, and I happen to know the dogs adore him. I'm not making excuses for the dirty, unsanitary bizarre situation, I'm just asking people to understand that this is an illness, a compulsion, not animal cruelty as in the Michael Vick case of dog fighting. Don't be fooled by the price of the house in the article and assume this is a rich person, he is all but destitute living in the family home he grew up in all alone after his parents passed away some years ago. His dogs have been his whole life, his best friends, he knows each of them by name and can tell each from the other. He's never deprived them of food and water and love or treated them unkindly. Remember, he lived in the same conditions as the dogs. His dream was to be able to afford to live in peace in the country with his dogs and have enough money to build separate proper dog quarters for them with enough land so they could be able to run free in the fresh air. He didn't abandon them in the house there and leave them to their own devices, he was forced to drive down to the old house to clean it up to sell it because he couldn't afford to hire anyone to do it. He only left them for a day or so at a time, then drove back up to care for them. As I said, this is a terribly sad situation, more to be pitied than scorned. I hope that you good people in Oxford will try to be understanding, this man has been through so much in his life.He needs help.
AROD3KS
October 14th, 2008 at 8:00 pm
this is just disgusting, i wonder why it took so long to realize this was going on. if he had done something like this before, he should of been watched.
odon11
October 14th, 2008 at 2:40 pm
This situation is just disgusting. How can anyone leave animals locked up in a closed up trailer like that for such a long time.
I hope he's never allowed to own animals again.
issylu
October 14th, 2008 at 2:06 pm
Can you imagine only coming up once a week to feed over seventy dogs?? (read that in another article). Lives in an almost 4 million home and couldn't afford to hire someone to take care of the animals? SICK
Dave715
October 14th, 2008 at 12:32 pm
I want to adopt one.
Please log in to leave a comment.
© 2009 Snyder Communications/The Evening Sun
29 Lackawanna Avenue, Norwich, NY 13815 - (607) 334-3276