“The Deflated”

After watching the Oscars Sunday (a.k.a. getting highlights the next day because I passed-out somewhere in-between the awards for “Best Sock-Puppet in a foreign-short” and “Best Sock-Puppet Designer in a foreign-short”) it’s obvious that “make-up calls” aren’t exclusive to sports – they’ve made their way into the movies, too.

A make-up call in the sporting world occurs when “a referee makes an obvious mistake in penalizing a team or a player, and in an effort to rectify the irreversible screw-up, said referee arbitrarily hands-out an equally bad or worse penalty against the opposite team or player.”

Awarding “Best Picture” to The Departed and “Best Director” to its maker, Martin Scorsese, was a monster make-up call.

Starring Jack Nicholson (all-around bad guy), Matt Damon (bad guy pretending to be good guy) and Leonardo DiCaprio (good guy pretending to be bad guy), The Departed was an average mob movie at best. The plot had potential, the ending was pleasantly unpredictable, and the violence – not action – was definitely on par with Scorsese’s previous mob classics (i.e. Good Fellas and Casino). But two and a half hours of unconvincing and underdeveloped characters (giving everyone heavy and phony Boston accents doesn’t make them complex, it makes them annoying), pointlessly loud and vulgar dialogue (two unrelated conversations about menstruation, for example), and too many “Can you hear me now?” filler scenes spent talking on or looking at a cell phone made this one hard to enjoy.



A good actor or actress has to be believable. When you see Matt Damon, you don’t think “slick crooked-mobster cop,” you think, “Ben Affleck.” When you see Leonardo DiCaprio, you don’t picture “gritty undercover agent with a bad attitude,” you think, “wasn’t he on a few episodes of that show Growing Pains starring Kirk Cameron?” I would have rather seen Jack Nicholson re-do his role as “The Joker” from Batman for this one, because his portrayal of an Irish mobster with an Italian last name in The Departed was even weirder.

Other than looking sexy to the Academy, this movie looks like four pounds of big names (including Alec Baldwin, Martin Sheen and Mark Walhberg) and big budget bulging out of a three-pound bag – with no space for the story or the acting.

So how come Scorsese won? Because he’s great, and he’s been ripped-off for “Best Director” five times before. Plus, with his name attached to that line-up of actors, doing the type of movie he does best – for Scorsese not to win would be like the Vatican telling the Pope that his services are no longer needed.

It’s a make-up call – I think. See, The Departed was the only Oscar nominated film I’ve seen this year, so I’m not even sure if the others are getting the shaft to correct a previous shafting, it’s just an assumption. But look at it this way, if those movies are better than this one, then there’s something to look forward to. If they are all worse – then in this case the least stinky of the bunch got the soap.

Discuss this story with other members on the Forum

Today's Other Stories



Reader Response

6 comments on this story

jmorse
March 2nd, 2007 at 7:13 am
Is vlarsony having a grumpy day?
upstatenyer
March 2nd, 2007 at 5:26 am
C'mom "vlarsony" ease up - If you get worked up over Mike McGuire you better get your head examed!He's a great guy with good judgement and he's entitled to his opinion - you sore loser :) !
mmcguire
March 1st, 2007 at 12:26 pm
You must be new here. Thursday is always slotted for the disgusting, juvenile, and minority opinion column. Better luck tomorrow.
cavis
March 1st, 2007 at 12:09 pm
If you took the time to watch "Babel," you'd have a whole new appreciation for "The Departed." While "The Departed" wasn't as good as Goodfellas (pun intended), it sure didn't make me want to stab my eyes out like "Babel" did.
jude
March 1st, 2007 at 11:42 am
Martin Scorsese was just another in a series of make-up calls by Academy voters.

I certainly don't remember them all, but Russell Crowe's win for "Gladiator" in 2001 was largely seen as a "make-up call" for his snub the previous year for "The Insider" (which all agree was the far superior performance to his role as Maximus in "Gladiator.")

"The Departed" was great, but it ain't "Goodfellas." (It lost to "Dances with Wolves" in 1991, and Scorsese lost to-gasp!-Kevin Costner for director.)
vlarsony
March 1st, 2007 at 9:46 am
This editorial is fairly disgusting and represents an opinion few would share. The acting in The Departed was all-around spectacular and only a complete moron would watch DiCaprio and think nothing more intelligent about his performance than "wasn’t he on a few episodes of that show Growing Pains starring Kirk Cameron". How lame is that? If that was supposed to be amusing it fell flat. Same thing with thinking "Ben Affleck" while watching Matt Damon. Maybe the writer thinks these things but fortunately for the rest of us, we do not. And here's a tip that evidently didn't occur to the writer either: they don't give make-up awards to directors that include not only the director statue but best picture, best editing and best adapted screenplay. Grow the hell up or spare us anymore of this juvenile rhetoric.
Please log in to leave a comment.
© 2008 Snyder Communications/The Evening Sun
29 Lackawanna Avenue, Norwich, NY 13815 - (607) 334-3276